INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Myth, Math and the Money: Media Framing of the U.S. Gender Wage Gap debate from 1980-2014

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/21612

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF PASZTOR-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf (3MB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: Myth, Math and the Money: Media Framing of the U.S. Gender Wage Gap debate from 1980-2014
Author(s): Pasztor, Sabrina Kim
Advisor(s): Rojecki, Andrew
Contributor(s): Papacharissi, Zizi; Lind, Rebecca; Risman, Barbara; Bielby, William; Rojecki, Andrew
Department / Program: Communication
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree: PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Genre: Doctoral
Subject(s): Media framing gender wage gap public opinion
Abstract: This study seeks to ascertain the possible correlational role media framing plays in public discourse, public opinion, and policy formation related to the contemporary U.S. gender wage gap issue. I consider the linkages between salience of media messages, shifts in public opinion (attitudes) surrounding this issue, and partisanship in formulating public policy (behaviors). Through content analysis, I systematically analyze the predominant media frames on the gender wage gap in N=324 news articles from six mainstream media sources of varying ideological affiliation (conservative, liberal, centrist), including three major print (newspaper – The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and USA Today) and three electronic (television – CNN, NBC, Fox) news broadcast transcripts about the gender wage gap between January 1, 1980 – April 30, 2014. Employing Chong and Druckman’s (2006) media framing theory, I identify nine frames (including economic, social, and political frames), and correlate these with and around ‘significant events’ (legislative, policy reform) changes in public opinion. A clearer understanding of how media shapes messages on this issue has potential implications for developing public discourse towards reducing gender inequality, within the broader context of class inequities. Findings show: 1) media messaging is remarkably consistent regardless of news source; 2) media framing shows overall support for eliminating the gender wage gap with a preponderance of “pro” (eliminate the inequity) versus “con” arguments; 3) unless there is what I term a “perfect storm”, equating to a confluence of events (legislative discourse at the Congressional level, proposed or pending executive action, and an increase in media coverage and heightened public awareness surrounding these events), the impact of significant milestones is substantially reduced, occurring in only five of seventeen instances; and 4) of the nine frames identified and analyzed, Morality and Ethics as a frame is the key driver to influence ideological change towards perceiving men and women as equal ‘human beings’, and potentially shift both media framing from a demand-side to supply-side rhetoric that supports this transformation to the betterment of society.
Issue Date: 2016-11-29
Type: Thesis
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/21612
Rights Information: Copyright 2017 Pasztor, Sabrina Kim
Date Available in INDIGO: 2019-02-18
Date Deposited: December 2
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Statistics

Country Code Views
United States of America 90
Ukraine 19
Russian Federation 16
China 13
Canada 6

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key