INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index measurements

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item:

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF figure3.pdf (244KB) Figure 3 PDF
PDF figure2.pdf (361KB) Figure 2 PDF
PDF figure 1.pdf (319KB) Figure 1 PDF
PDF Abstract.pdf (60KB) Abstract PDF
PDF Abstract.pdf (60KB) Manuscript PDF
Title: Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index measurements
Alternative Title: Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index
Author(s): Dragstrem, Kristina; Galang-Boquiren, Maria Therese S.; Obrez, Ales; Costa Viana, Maria Grace; Grubb, John E.; Kusnoto, Budi
Subject(s): audiovisual equipment classification human malocclusion
Abstract: A digital analysis that is shown to be accurate will ease demonstration of initial case complexity. To date no literature exists on the accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index (DI) calculations when applied to pretreatment digital models. METHODS: Plaster models were obtained from 45 previous patients with varying degrees of malocclusion. Total Discrepancy Index score and its target disorders were computed manually with a periodontal probe on original plaster casts (gold standard) and digitally using Ortho Insight 3D (Motion View Software, Hixson, TN) and OrthoCad (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ). Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was assessed for 15 subjects using Spearman’s Rho correlation test. Accuracy of DI scores and target disorders were assessed for all 45 subjects using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was high for total DI score and most target disorders (r>0.8). No significant difference was found between total DI score when measured with OrthoCad compared to manual calculation. Total DI score calculated by Ortho Insight 3D was found to be significantly larger than manual calculation by 2.71 points. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that a discrepancy index calculated by MotionView Ortho InSisght 3D may lead the clinician to overestimate case complexity. OrthoCad’s discrepancy index module demonstrated to be a clinically acceptable alternative to manual calculation of total score.
Issue Date: 2015-07
Publisher: Mosby Inc.
Citation Info: Dragstrem, K., Galang-Boquiren, M. T., Obrez, A., Costa Viana, M. G., Grubb, J. E. and Kusnoto, B. Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index measurements. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics. 2015. 148(1): 60-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.027.
Type: Article
Description: Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ISSN: 08895406
Date Available in INDIGO: 2017-01-30

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record


Country Code Views
United States of America 88
China 81
Ukraine 15
Russian Federation 10
United Kingdom 5


My Account


Access Key