INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/20702

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF mlab-104-02-109.pdf (198KB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research
Author(s): Hanneke, R.; O’Brien, K.K.
Subject(s): Databases as topic Databases Bibliographic Information seeking behavior Information storage and retrieval Libraries Medical Web-scale discovery services
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative effectiveness of three web-scale discovery (WSD) tools in answering health sciences search queries. Methods: Simple keyword searches, based on topics from six health sciences disciplines, were run at multiple real-world implementations of EBSCO Discovery Service (EDS), Ex Libris’s Primo, and ProQuest’s Summon. Each WSD tool was evaluated in its ability to retrieve relevant results and in its coverage of MEDLINE content. Results: All WSD tools returned between 50%–60% relevant results. Primo returned a higher number of duplicate results than the other 2WSD products. Summon results were more relevant when search terms were automatically mapped to controlled vocabulary. EDS indexed the largest number of MEDLINE citations, followed closely by Summon. Additionally, keyword searches in all 3 WSD tools retrieved relevant material that was not found with precision (Medical Subject Headings) searches in MEDLINE. Conclusions: None of the 3 WSD products studied was overwhelmingly more effective in returning relevant results. While difficult to place the figure of 50%–60% relevance in context, it implies a strong likelihood that the average user would be able to find satisfactory sources on the first page of search results using a rudimentary keyword search. The discovery of additional relevant material beyond that retrieved from MEDLINE indicates WSD tools’ value as a supplement to traditional resources for health sciences researchers.
Issue Date: 2016-04
Publisher: Medical Library Association
Citation Info: Hanneke, R. and O’Brien, K. K. Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2016. 104(2): 109-117. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.004.
Type: Article
Description: © 2016, Medical Library Association. All rights reserved. © The Authors.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/20702
ISSN: 1536-5050
Date Available in INDIGO: 2016-06-08
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Statistics

Country Code Views
United States of America 89
China 56
Russian Federation 23
Germany 3
Ukraine 3

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key