INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

Alternate Day Fasting Versus Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss and Cardio-Protection

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19808

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF Trepanowski_John.pdf (3MB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: Alternate Day Fasting Versus Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss and Cardio-Protection
Author(s): Trepanowski, John F.
Advisor(s): Varady, Krista A.
Contributor(s): Haus, Jacob M.; Phillips, Shane A.; Baynard, Tracy; Song, Zhenyuan
Department / Program: Kinesiology and Nutrition
Graduate Major: Kinesiology, Nutrition, and Rehabilitation
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree: PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Genre: Doctoral
Subject(s): alternate-day fasting calorie restriction weight loss dietary adherence
Abstract: Background: Alternate-day modified fasting (ADF) has been shown to be effective for reducing body weight when tested for a short duration (8-12 weeks). However, no trial to date has examined adherence to ADF for longer periods, or compared ADF to daily calorie restriction (CR) for weight loss and improvement in cardiometabolic parameters. Objective: Accordingly, this study compared the effects of ADF versus CR on dietary adherence, weight loss, and cardiometabolic disease risk factors. Design: In a controlled feeding trial, overweight and obese participants (n = 102) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: 1) ADF (24-h feast day = 125% of needs, alternated with 24-h fast day = 25% of needs); 2) CR (75% of needs every day); or 3) control (100% of needs every day). In this way, the prescribed average daily energy restriction (25%) was the same for both intervention groups. The intervention period was 6 months, and consisted of a 3-month controlled feeding period followed by a 3-month self-selected feeding period. Dietary adherence, body weight, body composition, and cardiometabolic parameters were measured at month 0, 3, and 6. Results: Actual energy restriction (ADF: 21 ± 4%; CR: 24 ± 4%, P = 0.89) was similar between the intervention groups and greater when compared to the control group (8 ± 5%, P = 0.03). Weight loss (ADF: -6.9 ± 0.8 kg; CR: -7.6 ± 1.0 kg, P = 0.79) and total fat mass reduction (ADF: -4.5 ± 0.6 kg; CR: -5.6 ± 0.7 kg, P = 0.33) were also similar between groups and greater than the respective reductions in the control group (-0.7 ± 0.5 kg, P < 0.001; -0.6 ± 0.3 kg, P < 0.001). ADF demonstrated within-group reductions in total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, fasting insulin, and insulin resistance by month 6. CR experienced decreases in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and fasting insulin, post-treatment. No differences were noted between intervention groups or versus control for any of these vascular endpoints (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Dietary adherence and weight loss are similar between ADF and CR; however neither intervention alters other measured cardiometabolic parameters versus controls.
Issue Date: 2015-10-21
Genre: thesis
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19808
Rights Information: Copyright 2015 John F. Trepanowski
Date Available in INDIGO: 2017-10-22
Date Deposited: 2015-08
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Statistics

Country Code Views
United States of America 297
China 63
United Kingdom 39
Australia 28
Russian Federation 22

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key