INDIGO Home University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign logo uic building uic pavilion uic student center

The Rip Van Winkle Science: Credibility Struggles in the "Psychedelic Renaissance"

Show full item record

Bookmark or cite this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19782

Files in this item

File Description Format
PDF Giffort_Danielle.pdf (2MB) (no description provided) PDF
PDF Giffort - IRB Approval.pdf (23KB) (no description provided) PDF
PDF Giffort - Copyright Permission.pdf (544KB) (no description provided) PDF
Title: The Rip Van Winkle Science: Credibility Struggles in the "Psychedelic Renaissance"
Author(s): Giffort, Danielle M.
Advisor(s): Bielby, William
Contributor(s): Decoteau, Claire; Halpern, Sydney; McInerney, Paul-Brian; Chapkis, Wendy
Department / Program: Sociology
Graduate Major: Sociology
Degree Granting Institution: University of Illinois at Chicago
Degree: PhD, Doctor of Philosophy
Genre: Doctoral
Subject(s): Credibility Boundary Work Forbidden Knowledge Non-knowledge Psychedelic Drugs Psychedelic Science
Abstract: My dissertation traces the historical trajectory of science and psychedelics. I explain (1) why clinical research with psychedelic drugs was relegated to the status of forbidden knowledge, and (2) how contemporary scientists are working to restore the legitimacy of this scientific field. I draw on science studies literatures on credibility, boundary work, and nonknowledge as a starting point to answer these questions. My analysis is informed by semi-structured interviews, field observations, and historical and archival documents. The analysis that I present in this dissertation can be summarized as follows: The shifting boundaries of psychedelic science, from legitimate knowledge to forbidden knowledge and potentially back to legitimate knowledge again, have been shaped by struggles over the purity and pollution of science—struggles embedded in cultural, legal, and political systems of power. The main contribution of this dissertation is the concept of the impure scientist. While previous literature has considered how nonscientist “outsiders” threaten the purity of science, my research examines how scientist “insiders” contaminate these borders. I call this menacing figure the impure scientist—a historically and culturally contingent and institutionally embedded figure, a “performative image that can be inhabited,” who continually threatens the symbolic boundaries of science. My research demonstrates how the impure scientist is symbolically deployed in credibility contests over the production of legitimate knowledge. By introducing the concept of the impure scientist, this dissertation offers new insights about what knowledge gets produced, embedded in what systems of power, and with what consequences.
Issue Date: 2015-10-21
Genre: thesis
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10027/19782
Rights Information: Copyright 2015 Danielle M. Giffort
Date Available in INDIGO: 2017-10-22
Date Deposited: 2015-08
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Statistics

Country Code Views
United States of America 315
China 152
Russian Federation 30
Germany 10
United Kingdom 7

Browse

My Account

Information

Access Key